Re: Fwd: patch: make_timestamp function

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomáš Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>
Subject: Re: Fwd: patch: make_timestamp function
Date: 2014-03-02 09:59:29
Message-ID: CAFj8pRBPautQ2zRn6czRkN7gPcBFovb6UTg1HjiLt3nrunA6ZA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello

updated version - a precheck is very simple, and I what I tested it is
enough

Regards

Pavel

2014-02-28 15:11 GMT+01:00 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:

> Pavel Stehule escribió:
>
> > so still I prefer to allow numeric time zones.
> >
> > What I can:
> >
> > a) disallow numeric only timezone without prefix "+" or "-"
> >
> > or
> >
> > b) add "+" prefix to time zone, when number is possitive.
> >
> > I prefer @a.
>
> I can live with (a) too. But I wonder if we should restrict the allowed
> tz even further, for example to say that there must always be either 2
> digits (no colon) or 4 digits, with or without a colon.
>
> --
> Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
make_timestamp-2014-03-02-1.patch text/x-patch 23.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Antonin Houska 2014-03-02 11:30:07 Re: Equivalence Rules
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2014-03-02 09:50:41 Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe