Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
Date: 2011-12-09 17:08:30
Message-ID: CAFj8pRBD8qLK3MfUceoxttHXjW9ZpxY3w+h5Hkp3cSRifde-SA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello

2011/12/9 Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>:
> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> there is fixed version
>
> Here is my attempt at a doc patch.
>
> Could you add it to your patch so that all is in a single patch?
>

there is merged patch

Thank you

Regards

Pavel

> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe

Attachment Content-Type Size
check_function-2011-12-09-3.diff.gz application/x-gzip 24.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Singer 2011-12-09 18:01:37 Re: static or dynamic libpgport
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2011-12-09 16:35:53 Re: static or dynamic libpgport