Re: jsonb generator functions

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: jsonb generator functions
Date: 2014-10-15 11:38:48
Message-ID: CAFj8pRAFxAnOd8w99RiWey3_KCkJf6MV4PP4bgvucCgo9hqAXg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2014-10-13 17:22 GMT+02:00 Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>:

>
> On 10/13/2014 09:37 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>>
>> On 09/26/2014 04:54 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Here is a patch for the generator and aggregate functions for jsonb that
>>> we didn't manage to get done in time for 9.4. They are all equivalents of
>>> the similarly names json functions. Included are
>>>
>>> to_jsonb
>>> jsonb_build_object
>>> jsonb_build_array
>>> jsonb_object
>>> jsonb_agg
>>> jsonb_object_agg
>>>
>>>
>>> Still to come: documentation.
>>>
>>> Adding to the next commitfest.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Revised patch to fix compiler warnings.
>>
>>
> And again, initializing an incompletely initialized variable, as found by
> Pavel Stehule.
>

I checked a code, and I have only two small objection - a name
"jsonb_object_two_arg" is not good - maybe "json_object_keys_values" ?

Next: there are no tests for to_jsonb function.

Regards

Pavel

>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lucas Lersch 2014-10-15 11:49:21 Re: Buffer Requests Trace
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2014-10-15 11:00:10 Locking for Rename To new_name works differently for different objects