From: | Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Marco Nenciarini <marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Support for array_remove and array_replace functions |
Date: | 2012-06-30 02:16:08 |
Message-ID: | CAFaPBrTxJQNJ_Hatt=J2dopGGMjwdTX=GVwER+7o4unCGM6N8Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Marco Nenciarini <
marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> following Gabriele's email regarding our previous patch on "Foreign
> Key Arrays"[1], I am sending a subset of that patch which includes only
> two array functions which will be needed in that patch: array_remove
> (limited to single-dimensional arrays) and array_replace.
>
> The patch includes changes to the documentation.
>
Hi, I've been reviewing this patch.
Good documentation, and regression tests. The code looked fine but I didn't
care for the code duplication between array_replace and array_remove so I
merged those into a helper function, array_replace_internal(). Thoughts?
Other than that it all looks good to me.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
array-functions_v2.patch.bz2 | application/x-bzip2 | 4.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit kapila | 2012-06-30 07:11:15 | patch-3 (3-allow-wal-record-header-to-be-split.patch)WAL Format Changes |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2012-06-30 01:28:13 | Re: elog/ereport noreturn decoration |