Re: CLUSTER FREEZE

From: Thomas Munro <munro(at)ip9(dot)org>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CLUSTER FREEZE
Date: 2013-10-25 22:19:02
Message-ID: CADLWmXVbAVZUhnHXdo4iT86_+E8QyKfTVdE9FVdgbh3d9cDAAw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 25 October 2013 01:17, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:

> On 10/24/2013 04:55 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> > I wonder if we should go so far as to make this the default behavior,
> > instead of just making it an option.
>
> +1 from me. Can you think of a reason you *wouldn't* want to freeze?

Ok, I attach an alternative patch that makes CLUSTER *always* freeze,
without any option (but doesn't affect VACUUM FULL in the same way). I will
post both alternatives to the commitfest app since there seems to be some
disagreement about whether tuple freezing should be an optional.

Thanks
Thomas Munro

Attachment Content-Type Size
cluster-freeze-always.patch application/octet-stream 1.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-10-26 02:07:44 Re: logical changeset generation v6.4
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2013-10-25 19:13:17 Re: Failure while inserting parent tuple to B-tree is not fun