Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup

From: Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, Samrat Revagade <revagade(dot)samrat(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup
Date: 2013-07-11 14:42:10
Message-ID: CAD21AoBF=3P1a=ydQp0Nbz3dkGm3ZGkELQQEhZZym_ySVPn-hg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I found a bug which occurred when we do vacuum, and have fixed it.
> yesterday (8th July) "Improve scalability of WAL insertions" patch is
> committed to HEAD. so v2 patch does not apply to HEAD now.
> I also have fixed it to be applicable to HEAD.
>
> please find the attached patch.
>
> Regards,
>
> -------
> Sawada Masahiko

I have fixed that master server doesn't waits for the WAL to be
flushed to disk of standby when master server execute FlushBuffer(),
and have attached v4 patch.
please find the attached patch.

Regards,

-------
Sawada Masahiko

Attachment Content-Type Size
failback_safe_standby_v4.patch application/octet-stream 21.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nicholas White 2013-07-11 14:51:01 Re: Request for Patch Feedback: Lag & Lead Window Functions Can Ignore Nulls
Previous Message Claudio Freire 2013-07-11 14:11:50 Re: SSL renegotiation