Re: CLUSTER FREEZE

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <munro(at)ip9(dot)org>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CLUSTER FREEZE
Date: 2013-11-20 08:38:14
Message-ID: CAApHDvrOnLRPWR1p4fcpEDNci7dJCp3w3akEQ7Ye7VzyL6VXRg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:35 PM, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I think that the patch should include some sort of notes in the documents
> to say that cluster performs freezing of tuples. I've attached a patch
> which adds something there, but I'm not 100% sure it is the right thing.
> Perhaps it should just read:
>
> Cluster also performs aggressive "freezing" of tuples similar to VACUUM
> FULL FREEZE.
>
> Although it's not exactly the same as you can perform a vacuum full freeze
> on a relation which does not have the clustered index set.
>
> I'll delay a bit to see if anyone else has any comments about what the
> docs should read, but I think it is pretty much ready for a commiter's eyes.
>
>
Hi Thomas,

I'm just going to mark the patch as waiting for author for now until you
get the chance to add some changes to the documents.

Everything else looks ok.

Regards

David Rowley

> Regards
>
> David Rowley
>
>
>
>
>> Thanks
>> Thomas Munro
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>>
>>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Soroosh Sardari 2013-11-20 08:46:02 VACUUM for TOASTed objects
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2013-11-20 08:31:50 Re: Easily reading debug_print_plan