Re: appendPQExpBufferVA vs appendStringInfoVA

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: appendPQExpBufferVA vs appendStringInfoVA
Date: 2013-11-14 08:33:59
Message-ID: CAApHDvq5JmnxoHSti-d9FikeCkV=QK=QHuaek==GSnM=zk8QDA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 3:18 AM, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I'm low on ideas on how to improve things much around here for now, but
> for what it's worth, I did create a patch which changes unnecessary calls
> to appendPQExpBuffer() into calls to appendPQExpBufferStr() similar to the
> recent one for appendStringInfo and appendStringInfoString.
>
>
>
Attached is a re-based version of this.

Regards

David Rowley

> Regards
>
> David Rowley
>
>
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
appendPQExpBufferStr_v0.2.patch.gz application/x-gzip 24.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mika Eloranta 2013-11-14 09:27:42 Re: [PATCH] pg_basebackup: progress report max once per second
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2013-11-14 08:21:07 Re: nested hstore patch