Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp
Date: 2011-10-13 12:25:28
Message-ID: CA+TgmoasVGK8XPCov4sK139S_Es04Fq+QVGJTZO2SALVhM8s3w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Simon, could you? If your proposal turns out to be better than mine, I'd be
>> happy to agree to drop my patch and adopt yours.
>
> Yes, will do.

Simon,

I believe that we are still waiting for this.

Thanks,

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thom Brown 2011-10-13 13:32:02 Additional supplied modules
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2011-10-13 11:23:14 Re: ts_rank