From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au> |
Cc: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Docs: Make notes on sequences and rollback more obvious |
Date: | 2012-08-21 15:18:00 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZMX0dNg3M5rD1zfFLkB_HDoeERpzyG5Dby8jmjtmYveA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au> wrote:
> Trying again with the attachments; the archiver only seemed to see the first
> patch despite all three being attached. Including patches inline; if you
> want 'em prettier, see:
>
> https://github.com/ringerc/postgres/tree/sequence_documentation_fixes
>
>
> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Make sure you can't read through mvcc.sgml without
> realising that not everything is MVCC.
>
The first of these three patches looks good to me, so I committed it.
I am not convinced that the others are ready to go in. AFAICS, there
hasn't been any discussion of whether a list of non-transactional
features would be a useful thing to have, or if so where it should be
located in the docs and what should go into it. I'm not necessarily
opposed to adding something, but I think it needs some actual
discussion before we commit anything.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-08-21 15:18:11 | Re: 9.2RC1 wraps this Thursday ... |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2012-08-21 15:10:57 | Re: temporal support patch |