Re: enhanced error fields

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: enhanced error fields
Date: 2012-07-23 14:23:35
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY5L6GKkVMHnuZ5ajLiufg2Gg-SDOHDBK+ZUT02HcohpQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> You don't have to agree with all of those things of course, but you
>> should have at least commented on them. I didn't spend time cleaning
>> things up only to have those changes ignored. I'm particularly
>> surprised that the documentation alterations were not retained, as you
>> yourself asked me to make those revisions.
>
> again, I am sorry - my last patch should to define structure (files) -
> because it was significant topic. When we will find a agreement, then
> I'll merge changes messages, comments, doc

It seems clear that it's not reasonable to expect any more review to
be done here this CommitFest, given that the changes from reviews
already made haven't been incorporated into the patch. Therefore, I'm
going to mark this one Returned with Feedback.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-07-23 14:29:06 Re: 9.2 release schedule
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-07-23 14:17:39 Re: [PATCH] XLogReader v2