From: | Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Postgres - Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pl/python custom exceptions for SPI |
Date: | 2011-02-13 17:49:14 |
Message-ID: | BLU0-SMTP103FBE80215C64D6A193808ED10@phx.gbl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11-02-12 05:58 AM, Jan Urbański wrote:
> On 11/02/11 10:53, Jan Urbański wrote:
>> On 10/02/11 22:26, Steve Singer wrote:
> Here's an updated patch with documentation. It's an incremental patch on
> top of the latest explicit-subxacts version.
>
This looks fine. I've attached a one word documentation change to go o
top of the patch.
I'll let Peter decide if he likes those assert's or not. I don't have a
good enough sense of if we often use asserts in that fashion elsewhere.
> Cheers,
> Jan
>
>
>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
plpython_custom_exceptions_docpatch.diff | text/x-patch | 898 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-02-13 17:56:05 | Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling |
Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2011-02-13 17:40:37 | Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling |