Re: pl/python custom exceptions for SPI

From: Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>
To: Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Postgres - Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pl/python custom exceptions for SPI
Date: 2011-02-13 17:49:14
Message-ID: BLU0-SMTP103FBE80215C64D6A193808ED10@phx.gbl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11-02-12 05:58 AM, Jan Urbański wrote:
> On 11/02/11 10:53, Jan Urbański wrote:
>> On 10/02/11 22:26, Steve Singer wrote:
> Here's an updated patch with documentation. It's an incremental patch on
> top of the latest explicit-subxacts version.
>

This looks fine. I've attached a one word documentation change to go o
top of the patch.

I'll let Peter decide if he likes those assert's or not. I don't have a
good enough sense of if we often use asserts in that fashion elsewhere.

> Cheers,
> Jan
>
>
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
plpython_custom_exceptions_docpatch.diff text/x-patch 898 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-02-13 17:56:05 Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2011-02-13 17:40:37 Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling