Re: Fwd: Keywords in pg_hba.conf should be field-specific

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Keywords in pg_hba.conf should be field-specific
Date: 2011-06-26 17:10:13
Message-ID: BANLkTikwo8r-SA-cbY=rJJcENitvKCt-MQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello

>
> I have touched next_token() and next_token_expand() a bit more, because
> it seemed to me that they could be simplified further (the bit about
> returning the comma in the token, instead of being a boolean return,
> seemed strange).  Please let me know what you think.
>

I am thinking, so it is ok.

I am not sure, if load_ident is correct. In load_hba you clean a
previous context after successful processing. In load_ident you clean
data on start. Is it ok?

Regards

Pavel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2011-06-26 17:12:07 Re: Range Types and length function
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2011-06-26 17:06:36 Re: Range Types, constructors, and the type system