Re: pg_dump directory archive format / parallel pg_dump

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump directory archive format / parallel pg_dump
Date: 2011-02-08 04:34:07
Message-ID: AANLkTinjxM0ZRsocLLogbGUpbDNbAbtPTSWDYD9B4xcO@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de> wrote:
>> i guess the huge amount of info is showing the patch is just for
>> debugging and will be removed before commit, right?
>
> That's right.

So how close are we to having a committable version of this? Should
we push this out to 9.2?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2011-02-08 04:52:01 Re: Re: patch: fix performance problems with repated decomprimation of varlena values in plpgsql
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-02-08 04:30:49 Re: Revised patches to add table function support to PL/Tcl (TODO item)