| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Böszörményi Zoltán <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Subject: | Re: ECPG FETCH readahead |
| Date: | 2010-10-13 23:47:14 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinij9ULnS54zKsdAJnhvuj-07-8-T-D=Nwk6f14@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:04:30PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> Is there a reason not to enable it by default? I'm a bit worried
>> that it will receive no testing if it's not always on.
>
> Yes, there is a reason, namely that you don't need it in native mode at all.
> ECPG can read as many records as you want in one go, something ESQL/C
> apparently cannot do. This patch is a workaround for that restriction. I still
> do not really see that this feature gives us an advantage in native mode
> though.
So, who has the next action on this patch? Does Zoltan need to revise
it, or does Michael need to review it, or where are we?
Thanks,
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christian Ullrich | 2010-10-14 00:30:43 | Re: [GENERAL] Text search parser's treatment of URLs and emails |
| Previous Message | fazool mein | 2010-10-13 23:23:57 | Timeline in the light of Synchronous replication |