Re: Named restore points

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Named restore points
Date: 2011-02-08 03:59:03
Message-ID: AANLkTinJ-2fPjEM7jj91RkU5DPnRqwWwK59JZK1eNgsC@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> ok, i will see you're reviewed version later today

This patch is still marked as "Needs Review" in the CommitFest
application, but I'm thinking perhaps it should be changed to Ready
for Committer? Are there any open issues?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-02-08 04:01:17 Re: Add ENCODING option to COPY
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-02-08 03:50:19 Re: ALTER TABLE ... ADD FOREIGN KEY ... NOT ENFORCED