Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren
Date: 2010-12-22 06:51:09
Message-ID: AANLkTimV7YZHACN=MugXu0GSUg=-7z34EjsyM1JHK3_L@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> How about doing target != ALL test at the head for the most common case
>> (target == ALL)?
>
> That's an idea, but the test you propose implements it incorrectly.

Thanks! I revised the patch.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

Attachment Content-Type Size
signal-some-children-v3.patch application/octet-stream 1.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-12-22 07:15:17 Re: Can postgres create a file with physically continuous blocks.
Previous Message Jesper Krogh 2010-12-22 05:24:48 Re: The cost of visibillity testing? (gin-search)