| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [v9.1] Add security hook on initialization of instance |
| Date: | 2010-07-08 13:14:38 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimC9upEIX4qdGeRByRXhXNrBprm9q4rJo_S4ghK@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2010/6/16 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>:
> OK, fair enough. Please wait for a few days.
> I'll introduce the proof-of-concept module until this week.
I think we have decided not to pursue this, at least for now. If that
is the case, the CommitFest entry should be updated to Returned with
Feedback.
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=323
FWIW, I am still of the opinion that we shouldn't have a hook here
anyway, because there is no reason to complain about lack of a
security context until the user performs an action which requires them
to have a security context.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-07-08 13:22:12 | Re: GSoC - code of implementation of materialized views |
| Previous Message | Pavel | 2010-07-08 13:09:06 | Re: GSoC - code of implementation of materialized views |