Re: Reworks of DML permission checks

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reworks of DML permission checks
Date: 2010-07-09 20:53:56
Message-ID: AANLkTiltWQpkqt-uvbWMZG6TeEy34AnVJhSIV98L6lKM@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2010/6/14 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>:
> The attached patch tries to rework DML permission checks.
>
> It was mainly checked at the ExecCheckRTEPerms(), but same logic was
> implemented in COPY TO/FROM statement and RI_Initial_Check().
>
> This patch tries to consolidate these permission checks into a common
> function to make access control decision on DML permissions. It enables
> to eliminate the code duplication, and improve consistency of access
> controls.

This patch is listed on the CommitFest page, but I'm not sure if it
represents the latest work on this topic. At a minimum, it needs to
be rebased.

I am not excited about moving ExecCheckRT[E]Perms to some other place
in the code. It seems to me that will complicate back-patching with
no corresponding advantage. I'd suggest we not do that. The COPY
and RI code can call ExecCheckRTPerms() where it is. Maybe at some
point we will have a grand master plan for how this should all be laid
out, but right now I'd prefer localized changes.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-07-09 21:21:54 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add a hook in ExecCheckRTPerms().
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-07-09 20:37:39 Re: [PATCH] Re: Issue: Deprecation of the XML2 module 'xml_is_well_formed' function