Re: ask for review of MERGE

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Boxuan Zhai <bxzhai2010(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ask for review of MERGE
Date: 2010-10-14 01:27:28
Message-ID: AANLkTikYKcOrfgW3Lkf+fCx_xv5sU3VxfWaHUWw388dy@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Starting looking at the latest MERGE patch from Boxuan here tonight. The
> regression tests pass for me here, good starting sign. I expect to move onto
> trying to break it more creatively next, then onto performance tests.
> Nothing much more exciting than that to report so far.

Greg, are you still working on a review of this patch?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-10-14 01:39:04 Re: Why do we have a database specification in .pgpass?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-10-14 01:25:37 Re: Re: starting to review the Extend NOT NULL representation to pg_constraint patch