Re: pg_ctl failover Re: Latches, signals, and waiting

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 15:25, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 05:24, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> I did s/failover/promote. Here is the updated patch.
>>>
>>> I rebased the patch to current git master.
>>
>> This patch looks fine to me.  I will mark it Ready for Committer.
>>
>> (Someone else please feel free to pick it up for the actual commit, if
>> you have cycles.)
>
> I see that the docs part of the patch removes the mentioning of
> reporting servers - is that intentional, or a mistake? Seems that
> usecase still remains, no?

Also, the patch no longer applies, since it conflicts with
faa0550572583f51dba25611ab0f1d1c31de559b.

Since you (Fujii-san) wrote both of them, feel like rebasing it
properly for current master?

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/