| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, fazool mein <fazoolmein(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, ganesh(at)vmware(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry |
| Date: | 2010-09-15 12:39:33 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTik2c3kV7HgJnM4MjkCWVG-QvDJXD3iR9TqsCnpP@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:38 AM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
>> Now that the latch patch is in, when do you think you'll be able to use it
>> instead of the poll loop?
>
> Here is the updated version, which uses a latch in communication from
> walsender to backend. I've not changed the others. Because walsender
> already uses it in HEAD, and Heikki already proposed the patch which
> replaced the poll loop between walreceiver and startup process with
> a latch.
I rebased the patch against current HEAD because it conflicted with
recent commits about a latch.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| synchrep_0915-2.patch | application/octet-stream | 80.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-09-15 13:15:53 | Re: Serializable Snapshot Isolation |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-09-15 12:23:52 | Re: Sync Replication with transaction-controlled durability |