Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, fazool mein <fazoolmein(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, ganesh(at)vmware(dot)com
Subject: Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry
Date: 2010-09-15 09:58:54
Message-ID: AANLkTik2A1o0tB4-RAxMZU+Md0EY5cgU_hpJjE+ixxch@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:38 AM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> Now that the latch patch is in, when do you think you'll be able to use it
> instead of the poll loop?

Here is the updated version, which uses a latch in communication from
walsender to backend. I've not changed the others. Because walsender
already uses it in HEAD, and Heikki already proposed the patch which
replaced the poll loop between walreceiver and startup process with
a latch.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

Attachment Content-Type Size
synchrep_0915.patch application/octet-stream 81.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-09-15 10:35:05 pgsql: Use a latch to make startup process wake up and replay
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-09-15 08:54:32 Re: Sync Replication with transaction-controlled durability