Re: CF 2009-07: initial reviewing assignments
- From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
- To: Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>
- Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, "pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: CF 2009-07: initial reviewing assignments
- Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:16:21 +0100
- Message-id: <8D08CBBA-9297-4E6D-9966-BF1718EB1D22@mit.edu> <text/plain>
Everyone is most definitely encouraged to just pick up a patch. In the
past we've found people are often reluctant to do so especially for
patche that seem to require specialized background. The rrreviewers
are there to give people that extra encouragement.
--
Greg
On 2009-07-17, at 5:02 AM, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:44:51PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Jul 16, 2009, at 11:01 PM, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:42:38PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Jaime
Casanova<jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:
should i wait until it gets committed or will you assign me some
other patch?
How about this one next?
Make pg_restore --clean to delete existing large objects
Can I have one, too? My patch submitter just concluded his patch
needs
reworking.
Sure, how 'bout DefaultACLs?
For future reference, would it be easier if a rrreviewer-in-need-of-
work just
picked a patch, or would you like to be the Gatekeeper? (Insert
reference to
The Keymaster here...)
--
Joshua Tolley / eggyknap
End Point Corporation
http://www.endpoint.com
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index