Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com>
- Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Mikko Partio <mpartio(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pallav Kalva <pkalva(at)livedatagroup(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:48:43 -0400
- Message-id: <815.1188589723@sss.pgh.pa.us> <text/plain>
Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com> writes: > On Aug 31, 2007, at 2:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> It's worth noting that the patch Florian is working on, to suppress >> assignment of XIDs for transactions that never write anything, will make >> for a large reduction in the rate of XID consumption in many real-world >> applications. > Off topic and just out of curiousity, is this the work that will > allow standby servers to have selects run on them without stopping > WAL replay? It's a small component of that. regards, tom lane
- References:
- 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- From: Pallav Kalva
- Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- From: Pallav Kalva
- Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- From: Alvaro Herrera
- Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- From: Mikko Partio
- Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- From: Alvaro Herrera
- Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- From: Erik Jones
- 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- Prev by Date: Re: [Solved] Postgres performance problem
- Next by Date: Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- Previous by thread: Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- Next by thread: Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- Indexes: