| From: | Daniel Farina <drfarina(at)acm(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net>, Daniel Farina <dfarina(at)truviso(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add tests to dblink covering use of COPY TO FUNCTION |
| Date: | 2009-12-30 02:23:38 |
| Message-ID: | 7b97c5a40912291823v405037b9v30e454b5c7d2c39@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I am very fuzzy on where we stand with this patch. There's a link to
> the initial version on the commitfest application, but there has been
> so much discussion since then that I think there are probably some
> revisions to be made, though I can't say I know exactly what they are.
>
> I did also check the git branch, but it does not merge cleanly with the master.
>
> Is there a more recent version? Is this still under development? Or
> have we decided to go a different direction with it?
I think we've decided to go in a different direction for
implementation, and my last communication was to suggest a mechanism
that would allow for something more clean using the copy options
refactoring. I wouldn't even attempt to merge it unless there's big
outcry for the feature as-is, which I doubt there is. But perhaps
it's worthy TODO fodder.
The mechanics in the email you replied to probably need more feedback to act.
fdr
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2009-12-30 02:29:50 | msvc build fails in Japanese environment |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-12-30 02:17:49 | Re: Stats for inheritance trees |