Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Key word table update for SQL:2008
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
- Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: Key word table update for SQL:2008
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 08:33:17 -0500
- Message-id: <6892.1227706397@sss.pgh.pa.us> <text/plain>
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes: > I was planning to update the key words table > (http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/sql-keywords-appendix.html) > for SQL:2008 and was wondering whether there is interest in keeping the > SQL-92 through SQL:2003 columns. It might look a bit overloaded then. > Comments? Perhaps the most useful thing would be to keep SQL-92 and latest, so as to show the "full range" in what's been reserved or not in different spec revisions. regards, tom lane
- References:
- Key word table update for SQL:2008
- From: Peter Eisentraut
- Key word table update for SQL:2008
- Prev by Date: Re: New XML-based man page build
- Next by Date: Re: New XML-based man page build
- Previous by thread: Key word table update for SQL:2008
- Next by thread: Re: pg_standby supported versions
- Indexes: