Re: array_length(anyarray)

From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostGreSql hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: array_length(anyarray)
Date: 2014-01-18 03:07:21
Message-ID: 52D9EFE9.20608@joh.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/12/14, 5:53 AM, I wrote:
> On 1/9/14, 2:57 PM, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>> How it should behave for multi-dimensional arrays is less clear, but
>> I'd argue that it should return the total number of elements, i.e.
>> cardinality('{{1,2},{3,4}}'::int[][]) = 4. That would make it
>> consistent with the choices we've already made for unnest() and
>> ordinality:
>> - cardinality(foo) = (select count(*) from unnest(foo)).
>> - unnest with ordinality would always result in ordinals in the range
>> [1, cardinality].
>
> Ignoring my proposal, this seems like the most reasonable option. I'll
> send an updated patch along these lines.

Here's the patch as promised. Thoughts?

Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja

Attachment Content-Type Size
cardinality.patch text/plain 5.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-01-18 03:17:28 Re: [PATCH] Make various variables read-only (const)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-01-18 02:01:01 Re: Minor improvements to sslinfo contrib module