| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | cedric(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Remove useless USE_PGXS support in contrib |
| Date: | 2013-07-11 03:30:29 |
| Message-ID: | 51DE26D5.90307@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/10/2013 09:04 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 07/04/2013 06:11 AM, Cédric Villemain wrote:
>> Le mercredi 3 juillet 2013 23:56:42, Josh Berkus a écrit :
>>> Peter, Cedric, etc.:
>>>
>>> Where are we on this patch? Seems like discussion died out. Should it
>>> be bounced?
>> I for myself have been presuaded that it is a good idea. Things apparently loosed are not, it just outline that we need better coverage in PGXS area, so it is another thing to consider (TODO : add resgress test for PGXS ...)
>>
> To be more focused: is this patch going to be committed in the next 4
> days or not? If not, it's time to mark it "returned" so we can have
> leisurely spec argument later.
I think that would probably be the better course. I'm not sure there is
a consensus about this.
cheers
andrew
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-07-11 03:43:52 | Re: changeset generation v5-01 - Patches & git tree |
| Previous Message | Fabrízio de Royes Mello | 2013-07-11 03:04:09 | Re: Add regression tests for DISCARD |