| From: | Karol Trzcionka <karlikt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax |
| Date: | 2013-07-05 01:22:33 |
| Message-ID: | 51D61FD9.8040803@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
according to my mentor's suggestion, I send first PoC patch of
"RETURNING AFTER/BEFORE" statement. Some info:
- it is early version - more hack PoC than RC patch
- AFTER in this version works as decribed before but it returns row
after update but before post-update before (to be fixed or switch with
current "*" behaviour - I don't know yet)
- patch passes all regression tests
- the code is uncommented already, to be fixed
I'm not sure what may fail so you use it on your risk ;)
Regards,
Karol
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| before_after_poc.patch | text/x-patch | 12.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Arulappan, Arul Shaji | 2013-07-05 02:11:25 | Proposal - Support for National Characters functionality |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-07-04 21:06:05 | Re: strange IS NULL behaviour |