From: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Marc Cousin <cousinmarc(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework |
Date: | 2012-04-05 06:02:16 |
Message-ID: | 4F7D3568.1020308@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2012-04-04 21:30 keltezéssel, Alvaro Herrera írta:
> I think this patch is doing two things: first touching infrastructure
> stuff and then adding lock_timeout on top of that. Would it work to
> split the patch in two pieces?
>
Sure. Attached is the split version.
Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi
--
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig& Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de
http://www.postgresql.at/
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
1-timeout-framework.patch | text/x-patch | 55.2 KB |
2-lock_timeout.patch | text/x-patch | 42.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hitoshi Harada | 2012-04-05 06:39:53 | Re: BUG #6572: The example of SPI_execute is bogus |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2012-04-05 06:00:49 | Re: Question regarding SSL code in backend and frontend |