Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework

From: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Marc Cousin <cousinmarc(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework
Date: 2012-04-05 06:02:16
Message-ID: 4F7D3568.1020308@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2012-04-04 21:30 keltezéssel, Alvaro Herrera írta:
> I think this patch is doing two things: first touching infrastructure
> stuff and then adding lock_timeout on top of that. Would it work to
> split the patch in two pieces?
>

Sure. Attached is the split version.

Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi

--
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig& Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de
http://www.postgresql.at/

Attachment Content-Type Size
1-timeout-framework.patch text/x-patch 55.2 KB
2-lock_timeout.patch text/x-patch 42.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hitoshi Harada 2012-04-05 06:39:53 Re: BUG #6572: The example of SPI_execute is bogus
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2012-04-05 06:00:49 Re: Question regarding SSL code in backend and frontend