Re: Instrument checkpoint sync calls

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Instrument checkpoint sync calls
Date: 2010-11-26 17:25:44
Message-ID: 4CEFED98.50501@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jeff Janes wrote:
> For the individual file sync times emitted under debug1, it would be
> very handy if the file being synced was identified, for example
> "relation base/16384/16523".

I was in the middle of looking into adding that already, so consider
that part of the target for the next update I'm working on.

--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
"PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance": http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitriy Igrishin 2010-11-26 17:41:08 Re: Suggested "easy" TODO: pg_dump --from-list
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-11-26 16:53:59 Re: duplicate connection failure messages