| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: "serializable" in comments and names |
| Date: | 2010-09-09 16:11:31 |
| Message-ID: | 4C890733.6070602@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/08/2010 10:02 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié sep 08 12:12:31 -0400 2010:
>>> AFAIR it doesn't keep the first snapshot around. If it did, most of
>>> your work on snapshot list trimming would have been useless, no?
>
>> That's my point precisely. The name "IsolationUsesXactSnapshot" makes
>> it sound like it applies to any transaction that uses snapshots for
>> isolation, doesn't it?
>
> I don't think so, at least not when compared to the alternative
> IsolationUsesStmtSnapshot.
The attached patch is updated for the various comments, as well as some
wording tweaks by me. If there are no objections I'd like to commit this
in a day or two.
Joe
--
Joe Conway
credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us
Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source
Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| sernoop-v1.4.patch | text/x-patch | 19.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2010-09-09 16:12:12 | Re: function_name.parameter_name |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2010-09-09 15:58:25 | Re: returning multiple result sets from a stored procedure |