| From: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: leaky views, yet again |
| Date: | 2010-07-21 10:35:58 |
| Message-ID: | 4C46CD8E.1020901@kaigai.gr.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
(2010/07/21 19:26), Robert Haas wrote:
> 2010/7/21 KaiGai Kohei<kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>:
>>> On the other hand, if it's enough from a performance
>>> point of view to review and mark only a few built-in functions like
>>> index operators, maybe it's ok.
>>>
>> I also think it is a worthful idea to try as a proof-of-concept.
>
> Yeah. So, should we mark this patch as Returned with Feedback, and
> you can submit a proof-of-concept patch for the next CF?
>
Yes, it's fair enough.
--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-07-21 10:39:28 | Re: managing git disk space usage |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-07-21 10:29:38 | Re: psql \conninfo command (was: Patch: psql \whoami option) |