Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Header And Logo

PostgreSQL
| The world's most advanced open source database.

Site Navigation

Search archives
  Advanced Search

Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema


  • From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
  • To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
  • Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Nikhil Sontakke <nikhil(dot)sontakke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
  • Subject: Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema
  • Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:19:37 -0400
  • Message-id: <4A803A89.9020509@dunslane.net> <text/plain>



Kevin Grittner wrote:
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
This would become much simpler if you could just execute plpgsql
code instead of having to define a function around it.
I have often wished for that feature.

You're not Robinson Crusoe.

It could be done in several ways.

One fairly simple way would use a new SQL verb (say, DO) like this:

DO $$ something in plfoo$ $ LANGUAGE plfoo;

We could even default the langauge to plpgsql, for which you would then just need:

DO $$ something in plpgsql $$;

The something would in effect be treated as a throwaway function taking no parameters and returning void.

But to make it really nice you'd have to move away from pl programs as strings. That would be a lot more work, and you really wouldn't want to make it work with more than one PL for the sake of everyone's sanity.

cheers

andrew



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996 – 2012 PostgreSQL Global Development Group