Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
I was planning to update the key words table (http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/sql-keywords-appendix.html) for SQL:2008 and was wondering whether there is interest in keeping the SQL-92 through SQL:2003 columns. It might look a bit overloaded then.
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Key word table update for SQL:2008
- From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
- To: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Key word table update for SQL:2008
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:43:16 +0200
- Message-id: <492D0C24.2010701@gmx.net> <text/plain>
I was planning to update the key words table (http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/sql-keywords-appendix.html) for SQL:2008 and was wondering whether there is interest in keeping the SQL-92 through SQL:2003 columns. It might look a bit overloaded then.
Comments?
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Key word table update for SQL:2008
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: Key word table update for SQL:2008
- Prev by Date: Re: Incomplete online documentation on conecting via ssh tunnels
- Next by Date: Re: pg_standby supported versions
- Previous by thread: Incomplete online documentation on conecting via ssh tunnels
- Next by thread: Re: Key word table update for SQL:2008
- Indexes: