Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Bad link for win32/latest
- From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
- To: Harald Armin Massa <haraldarminmassa(at)gmail(dot)com>
- Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
- Subject: Re: Bad link for win32/latest
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:49:31 +0200
- Message-id: <48DCCC4B.4000601@hagander.net> <text/plain>
Harald Armin Massa wrote: > my vote: > >>>> I can never remember, on what schedule do we remove old versions? Did we >>>> say "keep current and one older"? In that case, there is some removing >>>> to do as well... In binary, for example, we have 8.2.5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and >>>> 10 ATM - that just seems like a waste of space to me. For source, we >>>> have 8.2.7, 9 and 10, and in the 8.3 series 8.3.1, 3 and 4. We also have >>>> source/OLD which has 8.3.0, 8.2.5 and 8.2.6. All in all, seems we're not >>>> very consistent :-( > > I recommend to keep all versions including binaries available. Space is cheap. We already have "ftp-archive" which keeps the old stuffthat not so many people want. It's not a matter of removing it, it's a matter of staging it off to the other area. //Magnus
- References:
- Bad link for win32/latest
- From: Josh Berkus
- Re: Bad link for win32/latest
- From: Robert Treat
- Re: Bad link for win32/latest
- From: Magnus Hagander
- Re: Bad link for win32/latest
- From: Dave Page
- Re: Bad link for win32/latest
- From: Magnus Hagander
- Re: Bad link for win32/latest
- From: Harald Armin Massa
- Bad link for win32/latest
- Prev by Date: Re: Bad link for win32/latest
- Next by Date: Re: Upgrading pgFoundry
- Previous by thread: Re: Bad link for win32/latest
- Next by thread: Why do we block browsing of the documentation directories?
- Indexes: