Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Jav Database Performance
- From: Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
- To: Walter Cruz <walter(dot)php(at)gmail(dot)com>
- Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Jav Database Performance
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:35:02 +0100
- Message-id: <45E2A9C6.7080706@bluegap.ch> <text/plain>
Hi, Walter Cruz wrote:
Have anyone seen this? http://devloop.org.uk/documentation/database-performance/
Looks like a good, well documented benchmark. Was well worth the read. Probably even more if you're more into Java than I am.
What's surprising me is, that PostgreSQL often was 'only marginally slower' compared to MySQL. First, I thought: wow, MySQL must have improved. But later on, I've read that they tested the MyISAM storage engine. Thus, I'm surprised that
a) they perform only marginally better, and b) that the results are so close and similar.I can only conclude, that PostgreSQL does a very well job in keeping the costs of consistency very low. ;-)
Regards Markus
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Jav Database Performance
- From: Florian Weimer
- Re: Jav Database Performance
- From: Joshua D. Drake
- Re: Jav Database Performance
- References:
- Jav Database Performance
- From: Walter Cruz
- Jav Database Performance
- Prev by Date: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL on Windows Paper
- Next by Date: successful booth at Fosdem (Brussels)
- Previous by thread: Jav Database Performance
- Next by thread: Re: Jav Database Performance
- Indexes: