Re: Streaming replication, some small issues

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming replication, some small issues
Date: 2009-12-09 09:25:09
Message-ID: 3f0b79eb0912090125h75283c34ta4591a31e826b08@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> Thought? Am I missing something?
>>
>> This seems terribly overdesigned.  Just emit a warning when you see
>> the "unlogged op" record and have done.
>
> Sounds quite simple. OK, I'll do so.

Here is the patch:

- Write an XLOG UNLOGGED record in WAL if WAL-logging is skipped for only
the reason that WAL archiving is not enabled and such record has not been
written yet.

- Cause archive recovery to end if an XLOG UNLOGGED record is found during
it.

I add this patch to the CommitFest 2010-01.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

Attachment Content-Type Size
log_unlogged_op.patch text/x-patch 7.1 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin Pihlak 2009-12-09 09:28:28 Re: What happened to pl/proxy and FDW?
Previous Message Dave Page 2009-12-09 09:17:17 Re: [PATCH] Windows x64 [repost]