Re: [9.3 bug] disk space in pg_xlog increases during archive recovery

From: "MauMau" <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Fujii Masao" <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Jeff Janes" <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [9.3 bug] disk space in pg_xlog increases during archive recovery
Date: 2013-12-20 12:21:52
Message-ID: 3AB3A05BACF5430F83802BA56BE05AD3@maumau
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

From: "Fujii Masao" <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
> ! if (source == XLOG_FROM_ARCHIVE && StandbyModeRequested)
>
> Even when standby_mode is not enabled, we can use cascade replication and
> it needs the accumulated WAL files. So I think that
> AllowCascadeReplication()
> should be added into this condition.
>
> ! snprintf(recoveryPath, MAXPGPATH, XLOGDIR "/RECOVERYXLOG");
> ! XLogFilePath(xlogpath, ThisTimeLineID, endLogSegNo);
> !
> ! if (restoredFromArchive)
>
> Don't we need to check !StandbyModeRequested and
> !AllowCascadeReplication()
> here?

Oh, you are correct. Okay, done.

> ! /*
> ! * If the latest segment is not archival, but there's
> still a
> ! * RECOVERYXLOG laying about, get rid of it.
> ! */
> ! unlink(recoveryPath); /* ignore any error */
>
> The similar line exists in the lower side of exitArchiveRecovery(), so
> ISTM that
> you can refactor that.

That's already done in the previous patch: deletion of RECOVERYXLOG was
moved into else clause, as in:

- /*
- * Since there might be a partial WAL segment named RECOVERYXLOG, get rid
- * of it.
- */
- snprintf(recoveryPath, MAXPGPATH, XLOGDIR "/RECOVERYXLOG");
- unlink(recoveryPath); /* ignore any error */
-

Regards
MauMau

Attachment Content-Type Size
wal_increase_in_pitr_v2.patch application/octet-stream 4.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-12-20 12:22:07 Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-12-20 12:12:01 Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze