Re: Triggers on columns

From: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Triggers on columns
Date: 2009-10-07 21:57:40
Message-ID: 37ed240d0910071457k48781900ide1a9f3f5bf06dda@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2009/10/7 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>:
> On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 22:07 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> In short: while I haven't looked at the patch, I think Peter may be
>> steering you in the wrong direction.
>>
>> In cases where you do have related functions, I suggest having
>> SQL-callable V1 functions that absorb their arguments in this
>> style, and then have them call a common subroutine that's a plain
>> C function.
>
> Yeah, that's what he did.  So forget what I said. :-)
>

What's the current status of this patch in the commitfest process? I
see the last version posted by the author was on 14 Sep and there's
been some discussion since then, but no new patch version has
surfaced. Are we waiting on a new version of the patch, or is there
more review of the existing version yet to be done? The status of the
patch on the commitfest app is still "Needs Review", but I'm not sure
whether that is accurate.

Cheers,
BJ

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2009-10-07 22:09:56 Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2009-10-07 21:49:44 Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch