From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: inherit support for foreign tables |
Date: | 2014-12-17 22:04:00 |
Message-ID: | 30555.1418853840@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Attached are updated patches. Patch fdw-inh-5.patch has been created on
> top of patch fdw-chk-5.patch. Patch fdw-chk-5.patch is basically the
> same as the previous one fdw-chk-4.patch, but I slightly modified that
> one. The changes are the following.
> * added to foreign_data.sql more tests for your comments.
> * revised docs on ALTER FOREIGN TABLE a bit further.
I've committed fdw-chk-5.patch with some minor further adjustments;
the most notable one was that I got rid of the error check prohibiting
NO INHERIT, which did not seem to me to have any value. Attaching such
a clause won't have any effect, but so what?
Have not looked at the other patch yet.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2014-12-17 22:19:59 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-12-17 21:12:18 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} |