From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Marco Nenciarini <marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Support for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys |
Date: | 2012-10-24 16:17:47 |
Message-ID: | 28617.1351095467@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Marco Nenciarini <marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it> writes:
> Please find the attached refreshed patch (v2) which fixes the loose ends
> you found.
Attached is a v3 patch that updates the syntax per discussion, uses what
seems to me to be a saner (more extensible) catalog representation, and
contains assorted other code cleanup. I have not touched the
documentation at all except for catalogs.sgml, so it still explains the
old syntax. I have to stop working on this now, because I've already
expended more time on it than I should, and it still has the serious
problems mentioned in
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/16787.1351053391@sss.pgh.pa.us
and
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/28389.1351094795@sss.pgh.pa.us
I'm going to mark this Returned With Feedback for the current CF.
regards, tom lane
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
Array-ELEMENT-foreign-key-v3.patch.gz | application/octet-stream | 21.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Phil Sorber | 2012-10-24 18:48:07 | Re: proposal - assign result of query to psql variable |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-10-24 16:06:35 | Re: [PATCH] Support for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys |