Re: Syntax for partitioning
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
- Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Syntax for partitioning
- Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:16:16 -0400
- Message-id: <21974.1256937376@sss.pgh.pa.us> <text/plain>
Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> I haven't looked at all of these places yet, so maybe a few simple
> changes would allow us to treat typmod as a full 32 bits. Or perhaps it
> could just be expanded to a signed 64-bit int. What do you think?
Neither is likely to happen, and even disregarding that, I doubt people
would be real happy with a design like this. Where are you going to
put the typmod for the contained type?
regards, tom lane
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index