Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: TODO item: list prepared queries
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: TODO item: list prepared queries
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:43:26 -0500
- Message-id: <20906.1136058206@sss.pgh.pa.us> <text/plain>
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes: > daveg wrote: >> Could I suggest the reverse? That is, leave client statements alone and >> mark server side ones specially. It seems to me that "client" is the "normal" >> case and leaving it alone would be less intrusive. > Uh, the problem is that we don't normally mark SQL queries, so marking > only the server prepares and leaving the client prepares alone seems > inconsistent. Yesterday I was going to complain that this patch makes things more obscure rather than less so. daveg's confusion seems to confirm my feeling about it. I'll try to think of some wording I like better. regards, tom lane
- References:
- Re: TODO item: list prepared queries
- From: Bruce Momjian
- Re: TODO item: list prepared queries
- Prev by Date: Re: TODO item: list prepared queries
- Next by Date: [no subject]
- Previous by thread: Re: TODO item: list prepared queries
- Next by thread: Re: TODO item: list prepared queries
- Indexes: