From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Brightwell, Adam" <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Yeb Havinga <yeb(dot)havinga(at)portavita(dot)nl> |
Subject: | Re: RLS Design |
Date: | 2014-09-14 15:38:34 |
Message-ID: | 20140914153833.GY16422@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> > If we want to be able to disable RLS w/o dropping the policies, then I
> > think we have to completely de-couple the two and users would then have
> > both add policies AND turn on RLS to have RLS actually be enabled for a
> > given table. I'm on the fence about that.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> A strong +1 for doing just that.
Alright, updated patch attached which does just that (thanks to Adam
for the updates for this and testing pg_dump- I just reviewed it and
added some documentation updates and other minor improvements), and
rebased to master. Also removed the catversion bump, so it should apply
cleanly for people, for a while anyway.
Thanks!
Stephen
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
rls_9-14-2014.patch | text/x-diff | 324.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2014-09-14 16:32:41 | Re: documentation update for doc/src/sgml/func.sgml |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-09-14 15:21:10 | Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes |