Re: parallel pg_dump

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: parallel pg_dump
Date: 2012-12-08 16:01:07
Message-ID: 20121208160107.GA24326@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2012-10-15 17:13:10 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 10/13/2012 10:46 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> >On 09/17/2012 10:01 PM, Joachim Wieland wrote:
> >>On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>
> >>wrote:
> >>>Attached is a rebased version of the parallel pg_dump patch.
> >>Attached is another rebased version for the current commitfest.
> >
> >These did not apply cleanly, but I have fixed them up. The combined diff
> >against git tip is attached. It can also be pulled from my parallel_dump
> >branch on <https://github.com/adunstan/postgresql-dev.git> This builds and
> >runs OK on Linux, which is a start ...
>
> Well, you would also need this piece if you're applying the patch (sometimes
> I forget to do git add ...)

The patch is marked as Ready for Committer in the CF app, but at least
the whole windows situation seems to be unresolved as of yet?

Is anybody working on this? I would *love* to get this...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2012-12-08 16:01:33 Re: Proof of concept: auto updatable views [Review of Patch]
Previous Message Andres Freund 2012-12-08 15:33:54 Re: review: pgbench - aggregation of info written into log