Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby

From: Jun Ishiduka <ishizuka(dot)jun(at)po(dot)ntts(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com, ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com, heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Subject: Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby
Date: 2011-10-11 15:17:27
Message-ID: 201110111518.p9BFIhpk032107@ccmds32.silk.ntts.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> > I can't see a reason why we would use a new WAL record for this,
> > rather than modify the XLOG_PARAMETER_CHANGE record type which was
> > created for a very similar reason.
> > The code would be much simpler if we just extend
> > XLOG_PARAMETER_CHANGE, so please can we do that?
>
> Sure.
>
> > The log message "full_page_writes on master is set invalid more than
> > once during online backup" should read "at least once" rather than
> > "more than once".
>
> Yes.
>
> > lastFpwDisabledLSN needs to be initialized.
>
> I think it don't need because all values in XLogCtl is initialized 0.
>
> > Is there a reason to add lastFpwDisabledLSN onto the Control file? If
> > we log parameters after every checkpoint then we'll know the values
> > when we startup. If we keep logging parameters this way we'll end up
> > with a very awkward and large control file. I would personally prefer
> > to avoid that, but that thought could go either way. Let's see if
> > anyone else thinks that also.
>
> Yes. I add to CreateCheckPoint().
>
> Image:
> CreateCheckPoint()
> {
> if (!shutdown && XLogStandbyInfoActive())
> {
> LogStandbySnapshot()
> XLogReportParameters()
> }
> }
>
> XLogReportParameters()
> {
> if (fpw == 'off' || ... )
> XLOGINSERT()
> }
>
> However, it'll write XLOG_PARAMETER_CHANGE every checkpoints when FPW is 'off'.
> (It will increases the amount of WAL.)
> Is it OK?

Done.

Updated patch attached.

Regards.

--------------------------------------------
Jun Ishizuka
NTT Software Corporation
TEL:045-317-7018
E-Mail: ishizuka(dot)jun(at)po(dot)ntts(dot)co(dot)jp
--------------------------------------------

Attachment Content-Type Size
standby_online_backup_09base-02fpw.patch application/octet-stream 10.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-10-11 15:48:58 Re: Overhead cost of Serializable Snapshot Isolation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-10-11 15:05:18 Re: SET variable - Permission issues