From: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: New VACUUM FULL |
Date: | 2009-12-07 07:55:26 |
Message-ID: | 20091207165526.9550.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> You should take those out again; if I am the committer I certainly will.
> Such a test will guarantee complete instability of every other
> regression test, and it's not worth it.
I read the original comment was saying to add regression tests for
database-wide vacuums. But I'll reduce the range of vacuum if they
are not acceptable.
The new patch contains only table-based vacuum for local tables and some of
system tables to test non-INPLACE vacuum are not used for system tables.
VACUUM FULL pg_am;
VACUUM FULL pg_class;
VACUUM FULL pg_database;
Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
vacuum-full_20091207a.patch | application/octet-stream | 40.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-12-07 08:00:33 | Re: Reading recovery.conf earlier |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2009-12-07 07:36:14 | Re: named generic constraints [feature request] |