Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Header And Logo

PostgreSQL
| The world's most advanced open source database.

Site Navigation

Search archives
  Advanced Search

Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation

  • From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
  • To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
  • Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org>
  • Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation
  • Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:02:32 -0400
  • Message-id: <20090427200232.GF10358@alvh.no-ip.org> <text/plain>
David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:50:13PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On Monday 27 April 2009 20:10:27 David Fetter wrote:
> > > While we're at it, can we see about moving foreign keys out of the
> > > "advanced" section?  They've been standard for many years.  Heck,
> > > even MySQL has had them, at least in some of their engines, for
> > > many years.
> > 
> > Advanced doesn't have to mean nonstandard, and standard doesn't have
> > to mean basic.
> 
> Are you seriously arguing that foreign keys aren't basic?  Seriously?

Five years from now, are we going to move "recursive queries" to the
basic section?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996 – 2012 PostgreSQL Global Development Group